Format TBA
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlJ80wMRhwU&t=637s
washingtonnote.com/ian_bremer_mikh/
https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2513647175
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5781634930001/?#sp=show-clips
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaZznwvDil0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fq1fT9R7vnc
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trumps-immigration-push-a-window-into-his-follow-through/ar-AAz5Zv2?ocid=spartanntp
https://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=us+vs+them+ian+bremmer&tag=mh0b-20&index=aps&hvadid=77653060188821&hvqmt=b&hvbmt=bb&hvdev=c&ref=pd_sl_288ek5w6tf_b
FORMER HOME OF BEATINGAROUNDTHEBUSH.ORG >> HOME OF Political_Progress_For_People.blogspot.com >> >> >> Political Prodding and Probing People for Progress << << << >>> [[ For those NOT...BeatingAroundTheBush See links.]] <<< [[ EMAIL: LeRoy-Rogers at comcast net ]]
Showing posts with label New America Foundation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label New America Foundation. Show all posts
Sunday, June 24, 2018
Monday, July 07, 2014
Sunday, September 04, 2011
A GPS of Sorts
...with the try[**] angle of PACS[***].
[under construction]
Global Public Square *
Center for American Progress
Campaign for America's Future
New America Foundation.
* Atlantic Time
[**]note * differences
[*** 9-6-11 spare room for Three Faces of Eve?]
[Ledership is Tricky.]
[9-7-11 No comment, but see tetrahedron of comments. Well actually I will comment. While the numbers may not be what some may expect,(see Three Faces of Eve) the focus and targeted nature on schools may be a tantalizing stimulus for more: "Advocates for FAST have called for approximately $50 billion in upfront spending, with the hope that early investment would beget future ones as neighboring school districts petition their members of Congress for money of their own." ]
[9-8-11 Grand Slam to carry the model.
Pivoting the metaphor from personalities to the diamond, not to imply that there is any sexism in the sorting. Timing is noted in the lede reference in the last link on the prospects for the presidents speech. The Grand Slam is not as it seems, not necessarily personalities but aggregate hits. My original slam was against the Morning Brew that Joe Scorborough pours, but I had yet to hear Robinson swing. He hit it out of the park, while Obama has yet to come up to the plate in the ninth.]
[under construction]
Global Public Square *
Center for American Progress
Campaign for America's Future
New America Foundation.
* Atlantic Time
[**]note * differences
[*** 9-6-11 spare room for Three Faces of Eve?]
[Ledership is Tricky.]
[9-7-11 No comment, but see tetrahedron of comments. Well actually I will comment. While the numbers may not be what some may expect,(see Three Faces of Eve) the focus and targeted nature on schools may be a tantalizing stimulus for more: "Advocates for FAST have called for approximately $50 billion in upfront spending, with the hope that early investment would beget future ones as neighboring school districts petition their members of Congress for money of their own." ]
[9-8-11 Grand Slam to carry the model.
Pivoting the metaphor from personalities to the diamond, not to imply that there is any sexism in the sorting. Timing is noted in the lede reference in the last link on the prospects for the presidents speech. The Grand Slam is not as it seems, not necessarily personalities but aggregate hits. My original slam was against the Morning Brew that Joe Scorborough pours, but I had yet to hear Robinson swing. He hit it out of the park, while Obama has yet to come up to the plate in the ninth.]
Thursday, September 01, 2011
The Last Try Pod
Well, it was going to be the Last Word[*], but we know how that works.
So the Last Try Pod is more of the Tetrahedron.
A GPS of sorts, with the a try angle of pacs.
[No Relation or relative di-caught-o'me.]
9-2-11 Label added. See comment.
[*] Lawrence O'Donnell(see comment on comment above)
[The real tripod[!] (Articles 1, 2 & 3 of the Constitution)]
[In contrast to the "genius of freedom", our founding principles are pragmatic, incremental, and cooperative, like President Obama. Not to mention nuance from the right.]
[Simon says[**]: Smerconish]
[And We The People say to the White House]
[**] a subtle crack at coverage:
So it had to be in the House of Representatives, which the Republicans control. "But we couldn’t go if they didn’t let us come," the source said. "You can’t hold the speech in the lobby or in the parking lot. And you’re not going to get network coverage if you hold it at George Mason University."
Read more
So the Last Try Pod is more of the Tetrahedron.
A GPS of sorts, with the a try angle of pacs.
[No Relation or relative di-caught-o'me.]
9-2-11 Label added. See comment.
[*] Lawrence O'Donnell(see comment on comment above)
[The real tripod[!] (Articles 1, 2 & 3 of the Constitution)]
[In contrast to the "genius of freedom", our founding principles are pragmatic, incremental, and cooperative, like President Obama. Not to mention nuance from the right.]
[Simon says[**]: Smerconish]
[And We The People say to the White House]
[**] a subtle crack at coverage:
So it had to be in the House of Representatives, which the Republicans control. "But we couldn’t go if they didn’t let us come," the source said. "You can’t hold the speech in the lobby or in the parking lot. And you’re not going to get network coverage if you hold it at George Mason University."
Read more
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Inconvenient Jobs Conflict?
Breaking news! or Fixed News?
President Obama requests a joint session of congress to present his jobs plan, the same night as the next[**] Rebublican debate.
Is the timing problematic?[*]
Footnotes:
Committee for Responsible Federal Budget
New America Foundation
Chuck Todd : Andrea Mitchell
MSNBC
Digital Danger!
[*] 9-1-11 See "more".
[Also note links(4) added to first 3 footnotes]
[Oh what a web, some weave or un-weave.]
[**] "first" corrected: "next"
President Obama requests a joint session of congress to present his jobs plan, the same night as the next[**] Rebublican debate.
Is the timing problematic?[*]
Footnotes:
Committee for Responsible Federal Budget
New America Foundation
Chuck Todd : Andrea Mitchell
MSNBC
Digital Danger!
[*] 9-1-11 See "more".
[Also note links(4) added to first 3 footnotes]
[Oh what a web, some weave or un-weave.]
[**] "first" corrected: "next"
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Only Economists Need Apply
[Note: Lede*** Saved in draft as dated.
Blog post actually written...
Wednesday, 8-17-11]
...in* regard to the deeper line.
Yet on the light line, get the lead out.
Then there are sinkers.
The metaphor is getting fishy.**
[UNDER CONSTRUCTION: The Lede and last link pertains to GPS Krugman/Rogen an economic debate:
and further sorting
and here here, or there there .]
[Oh what a web E.B.B.]
[and the clash narrative]
* the tool box metaphor could be the tackle box metaphor
** (If revenue is forced to stay in the box, then QE may be one of those that must be used in conjunction with the array of other tackle)
*** Lede: Only Economists Need Apply (applies to **)
[Label added, is third there.]
Blog post actually written...
Wednesday, 8-17-11]
...in* regard to the deeper line.
Yet on the light line, get the lead out.
Then there are sinkers.
The metaphor is getting fishy.**
[UNDER CONSTRUCTION: The Lede and last link pertains to GPS Krugman/Rogen an economic debate:
and further sorting
and here here, or there there .]
[Oh what a web E.B.B.]
[and the clash narrative]
* the tool box metaphor could be the tackle box metaphor
** (If revenue is forced to stay in the box, then QE may be one of those that must be used in conjunction with the array of other tackle)
*** Lede: Only Economists Need Apply (applies to **)
[Label added, is third there.]
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
Real Mythication
Senator Franken on Republican entitlement.
Nicole Sanders on Lieberman Bill
Charge of the Dense Brigade
Speaking of Tools...
Seeking shelter, does not a tool make.*
I mean, why not credit it with conservationist or materialist ideology?(the octopus)(recycled or supply side economics)
(UP - date)
(Get err done, or is it ARRR?)
(Pulled from draft:
A portion of making a point? as inspired sources...
John Podesta
Doctrine airy
Hopenhagen?
What a drag.)**
REAL MYTHICATION (title finally added above).
Hmmm.
** or scroll over links
[Nightmare before Mainstreet?]
Nicole Sanders on Lieberman Bill
Charge of the Dense Brigade
Speaking of Tools...
Seeking shelter, does not a tool make.*
I mean, why not credit it with conservationist or materialist ideology?(the octopus)(recycled or supply side economics)
(UP - date)
(Get err done, or is it ARRR?)
(Pulled from draft:
A portion of making a point? as inspired sources...
John Podesta
Doctrine airy
Hopenhagen?
What a drag.)**
REAL MYTHICATION (title finally added above).
Hmmm.
The Real Rubric's Cube? Or from the mouth of Rubes or other caricatures?*sequentially eventually I beg to differ: a punderstanding of evolution
** or scroll over links
[Nightmare before Mainstreet?]
Friday, December 04, 2009
Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications.
you google*
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)
[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]
Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.
footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]
[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.
[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]
1-9-14 Kant we all ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches? No. Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics? Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant. Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics. Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee. (G'Ribble Label?)
Caution...The Goose for the Gander.(6-13-12)
[Kant We All Get Along Without Going To Hegel?]
It was the worst of times, it was the best of times. [**]
Steven Clemons: On Olbermann
Palin and the Pashtun and the Dickens it is.
Lawrence Wilkerson: on ibid. [6-22-12 Link Corrected]
A Christmas Carol meets A Wonderful Life.
Credit Olbermann, Clemons and Dick Cheney, not to mention Charles Dickens; the tales aside. It seems that we are broaching the American Dream from the nightmare of history.
footnote: Hegel Can't
Not to mention, D'Cart before Newton.[***]
[*] e for go figure; i.e. oops, ironically coined a word - NOT - how's 'bout realmystication? (Perhaps Realmythication?) But the question is, by the goose or the gander? More disambiguated, google may have adjusted as it no longer pops up "ramifications", but it could be my lack of foundation between the geek and the street. You might ask, what about google? Maybe a ribble, search me.
[** 12:08 PST 12-6-09: OK, I am not going to rhyme or jiggle but should I be glad I've maybe been read or mad I my might have been borrowed. Now that I have read the body of the work, the pop quiz it concludes with is rhetorical or at least left open, but least it had 4 options plus all of above; while a Republican Survey misdirected to me, was a push poll of yes, no and no opinion, which does not have as much wiggle room as their questions.] Along these lines, giving the "locked in" a "what for", as in not exactly any contradictions there.]
[Also 12-6-09 note that I was trying to determine if there is such a thing as Rubric's Cube, it was not a mispell as my previous post did refer to Rubic's cube.]
[12-16-09 Update made "go figure"(also 12-14 Realmythication apparently coined.]
[*** 12-23-09 link inserted ]
1-9-14 Kant we all ... ? Roots / Branches / axe knot*? Is it not that some are so lost from their roots they cut off branches? No. Or create limbs that leap? Ask if there are more primary fields than four mats: Physics, Psychology, Philosoply, Politics? Aphorism or fact: Truth is a determinant. Math is next to godliness, and religion parting from Platonics. Speaking of fields they are more than planes, knot too categorical lee. (G'Ribble Label?)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)